Already built
The world's largest live causal graph
for financial markets.
200,000+ variables across 30 time steps. PCMCI at industrial scale. Structure refreshed daily. Running now.
Scale comparison
200x beyond published SOTA.
The only known system running true causal inference at 200K+ variables with daily structural refresh.
Mission
Three gaps no existing
system closes.
Every major AI system today is built on text. The world does not run on text. It runs on numerical reality: prices moving, rates shifting, flows redirecting, structures forming and dissolving.
Correlation-based systems see that X and Y move together. They cannot tell you whether X drives Y, Y drives X, or both are driven by Z.
Abel discovers directed causal structure from data using constraint-based and score-based algorithms — then encodes it as a live DAG with 200K+ variables. Every edge has a direction, a β coefficient, a time lag τ, and a p-value. Not correlation matrices. Directed graphs.
Principle: Structure, Not Surface
The mathematical proof
Pearl's Causal Hierarchy
LLMs are stuck at Layer 1 — association. Abel operates at Layer 2 (intervention) and Layer 3 (counterfactual). A mathematical impossibility, not an engineering gap.
What is the probability of Y given that we observe X?
WHAT happened?
"BTC dropped 5% today"
Retrieves facts from indexed pages. No mechanism, no directionality. Pure observation.
HOW does it work?
"BTC often drops when Fed raises rates due to historical patterns"
Synthesizes patterns from training data. Sounds causal — is not. Cannot distinguish correlation from causation.
WHAT is connected?
"BTC ↔ DXY: β=−0.042, τ=5h, p<0.003 — a directed edge in the live causal graph"
Discovers directed associations with edge weights, time lags, and statistical significance.
One engine, two surfaces
Same question. Same engine.
Two interfaces.
200,000+ variables. 6M causal spatiotemporal nodes. Structure refreshed daily, predictions updated hourly. Whether you're a human or an AI agent — same engine.
Ask any decision question
“If the Fed raises rates 50bp, should I hold my crypto?”
Causal chain
Effect
−4.2%
95% CI
[−2.1, −6.8]%
β coeff
−0.042
Natural language in, structured causal analysis out. No code required.
Try Abel Appimport abel
client = abel.Client(api_key="sk-your-key")
prediction = client.predict("BTCUSD_close", horizon=48)
drivers = client.explain("BTCUSD_close", depth=2,
cross_domain=True)
effect = client.intervene("Fed_Funds_Rate", "BTCUSD_close",
treatment_value=0.5)
print(prediction)
print(drivers)
print(effect)`pip install abel-cap` — three lines to your first causal query. Typed responses, async support, and built-in caching for high-throughput agent pipelines.
MCP gives agents tools. CAP gives agents causal reasoning. Explore the live API at Abel CAP.
Abel CAP DocsSame question. Different universe.
What it looks like when
answers are computable.
Every number traceable to a graph edge. Every claim falsifiable with a timestamp.
“AI will augment designers rather than replace them. While AI tools can automate repetitive tasks, human creativity and empathy remain essential for great design.”
No numbers. No mechanism. No falsifiable claim.
Execution roles compress. Strategic roles compound. Move up, not sideways.
Signal
Structural Shift
Signal Lag
0h
P(up)
0.0%
Hops
0
Nodes
0
Edges
0
Depth
0layers
Speed
1.2s
Data freshness: 2h ago
Analysis
Platform→Toolmaker causal path (tau=84h, 2 hops) shows design-tool automation accelerating, but Toolmaker prob_up = 93.4% — toolmakers thrive while execution-only roles compress. Upskill into systems thinking and brand strategy; those roles have no automation parent in the graph.
What to do
Upskill into systems thinking and brand strategy. Execution-only roles have a direct automation parent in the graph — strategic roles do not.
Evidence
Will AI replace designers?
AI adoption → design job postings — causal, not opinion
Execution roles compress. Strategic roles compound. Move up, not sideways.
Signal
Structural Shift
Signal Lag
0h
P(up)
0.0%
Nodes
0
Edges
0
Depth
0layers
Speed
1.2s
Data freshness: 2h ago
Analysis
Platform→Toolmaker causal path (tau=84h, 2 hops) shows design-tool automation accelerating, but Toolmaker prob_up = 93.4% — toolmakers thrive while execution-only roles compress. Upskill into systems thinking and brand strategy; those roles have no automation parent in the graph.
What to do
Upskill into systems thinking and brand strategy. Execution-only roles have a direct automation parent in the graph — strategic roles do not.
Evidence
LLM would say
“AI will augment designers rather than replace them. While AI tools can automate repetitive tasks, human creativity and empathy remain essential for great design.”
For developers
Use the platform to give any LLM
a causal cortex.
Install the Abel Skill for zero-config causal reasoning, or go deeper with the Python SDK, MCP Server, and REST API. Abel CAP docs at cap.abel.ai cover every path.
MCP gives agents tools. CAP gives agents causal reasoning. Orthogonal by design — Schema-as-API provides deterministic, zero-LLM-cost routing into Abel's 200K+ variable graph.
npx skills add abel-ai-causality/Abel-skills --skill causal-abel
# Good first prompt:
# "Use causal-abel to explore: how might faster AI
# adoption ripple into jobs, wages, and household
# pressure? Map to market proxies and show the chain."
# The skill handles:
# ✓ OAuth agent handoff
# ✓ CAP capability inspection
# ✓ Verb routing (direct graph / proxy-routed)
# ✓ Result narration with caveatsInstall causal-abel and your agent gets OAuth handoff, CAP capability inspection, smart verb routing, and proxy-based reasoning out of the box. No raw API calls needed on day one.
Start making decisions with
live causal intelligence.
Interested in shaping the future of
causal intelligence? We're hiring.
Join Abelian Groups to stay on top of new
releases, features, and updates.